Degree of Authoritarianism Across 56 Countries is Predicted by the Average Personalities of Their Populations

Degree of Authoritarianism Across 56 Countries is Predicted by the Average Personalities of Their Populations


Using data on average big 5 personality traits in 56 countries from Schmitt et al. (2007), I tested the hypothesis that the higher order personality traits stability (made up of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability) and plasticity (openness and extraversion) (e.g. Wang et al. 2013) would emerge via factor analysis. I then tested the hypothesis that the degree of civil liberties across these countries (as scored by freedomhouse.org) would be predicted by the average scores on stability and plasticity in the populations of these countries. Both hypotheses were supported, and up to 73% of differences in authoritarianism across these countries was explained by the average scores on stability and plasticity in these countries. 


Hypothesis 1



Stability

Plasticity

Agreeableness

0.81

0.14

Conscientiousness

0.87

0.10

Neuroticism

-0.80

-0.20

Openness

0.02

0.86

Extraversion

0.32

0.69


Hypothesis 2



Stability

Plasticity

Agreeableness

0.81

0.14

Conscientiousness

0.87

0.10

Neuroticism

-0.80

-0.20

Openness

0.02

0.86

Extraversion

0.32

0.69

Civil Liberty

-0.68

0.52


References


  1. Schmitt et al. (2007) The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations

  2. Wang et al. (2013) Observed Personality in Childhood: Psychometric and Behavioural Genetic Evidence of Two Broad Personality Factors


Supplemental Data


Average Big 5 Traits & Civil Liberty Score for Each Country


E

A

C

N

O

Civ. Lib

Argentina

49.1

42.75

48.18

55.05

50.83

49

Australia

48.98

47.51

45.87

50.82

50.07

57

Austria

50.61

45.9

46.73

49.69

49.29

56

Bangladesh

44.98

50.49

46.71

51.2

53.35

24

Belgium

45.99

45.07

43.03

53.6

54.59

57

Bolivia

49.34

49.62

45.08

50.29

50.71

39

Botswana

49.56

52.11

50.27

48.61

48.19

44

Brazil

45.89

45.86

45.38

53.14

49.16

43

Canada

48.32

49.14

49.05

50.58

48.75

58

Chile

47.55

47.02

49.72

51.39

54.69

55

Congo

51.19

54.82

55.71

44.58

46.23

15

Croatia

51.7

45.2

46.02

46.16

48

49

Cyprus

49.1

51.16

48.49

51.44

49.36

56

Czech

50.22

44.09

42.87

51.02

50.59

55

Estonia

50.41

49.58

45.84

46.99

53.17

56

Ethiopia

47.11

51.82

54.36

46.12

47.15

13

Fiji

49.68

49.27

46

48.03

47.21

36

Finland

49.84

49.46

51.6

47.84

50.33

60

France

45.44

46.64

49.26

52.29

48.09

52

Germany

50.31

45.08

46.52

50.29

47.8

55

Greece

48.6

52.42

47.45

53.19

51.53

50

Hong

46.91

42.69

41.53

52.41

41.64

37

India

47.42

50.43

47.36

50

48.48

33

Indonesia

51.25

46.38

47.19

49.73

48.01

29

Israel

48.65

49.44

52.4

49.27

50.95

43

Italy

49.8

46.52

48.62

51.66

50

54

Japan

46.73

42.21

37.82

57.87

41.53

56

Jordan

48.35

53.73

49.77

49.86

47.1

23

Latvia

49.39

43.79

44.21

51.11

49.91

52

Lebanon

48.32

46.1

44.56

53.35

49.4

30

Lithuania

49.71

42.61

44.56

51.87

49.04

52

Malaysia

50.03

48.55

47.08

48.14

47.61

30

Malta

50.45

49.56

45.97

52.35

50.66

55

Mexico

50.24

49.51

45.72

48

52.26

34

Morocco

48.81

48.95

45.22

50.87

49.1

24

Netherlands

49.75

46.08

43.91

48.61

49.94

58

NewZealand

50.61

46.83

44.18

49.59

49.49

59

Peru

48.35

43.64

47.36

53.39

51.29

42

Philippines

48.12

47.96

43.14

51.41

49.34

31

Poland

49.12

46.74

46.15

51.8

49.06

48

Portugal

48.06

49.52

47.75

50.21

50.29

57

Romania

50.33

45.31

48.1

48.03

53.13

48

Serbia

51.95

47.64

47.53

50.17

52.44

42

Slovakia

49.05

47.38

42.44

51.57

52.53

53

Slovenia

50.54

50.18

49.24

45.28

50.5

56

SouthAfrica

49.61

49.97

49.61

49.01

49.01

46

SouthKorea

44.86

44.11

40.6

53.99

44.3

50

Spain

49

45.26

46.8

54.03

49.64

53

Switzerland

50.47

47.69

45.03

48.72

52.62

57

Taiwan

47.75

44.74

42.52

53.13

45.7

56

Tanzania

49.19

49.26

53.27

47.73

48.19

22

Turkey

51.59

47.89

48.71

49.88

52.7

16

Ukraine

46.45

39.05

43.89

48.02

42.06

34

UnitedKingdom

49.79

47.31

46.89

51.39

45.97

54

UnitedStates

50

50

50

50

50

51

Zimbabwe

48.69

49.77

51.75

48.26

48.52

17


Stability & Plasticity Factor Scores for Each Country


Stability

Plasticity

Argentina

-1.263

0.38

Australia

-0.252

0.18

Austria

-0.123

0.44

Bangladesh

-0.045

-0.20

Belgium

-1.690

0.48

Bolivia

-0.047

0.40

Botswana

1.396

-0.23

Brazil

-0.812

-0.77

Canada

0.512

-0.36

Chile

-0.232

0.72

Congo

3.213

-0.38

Croatia

0.317

0.47

Cyprus

0.527

-0.05

Czech

-1.162

0.73

Estonia

0.364

1.19

Ethiopia

2.349

-1.16

Fiji

0.624

-0.27

Finland

1.184

0.31

France

0.006

-1.21

Germany

-0.240

0.06

Greece

0.134

0.29

Hong

-1.074

-1.98

India

0.566

-0.63

Indonesia

0.086

0.31

Israel

1.027

0.11

Italy

-0.142

0.33

Japan

-2.438

-1.98

Jordan

1.435

-0.79

Latvia

-0.988

0.34

Lebanon

-0.940

-0.09

Lithuania

-1.148

0.24

Malaysia

0.625

-0.11

Malta

-0.246

0.65

Mexico

0.254

0.95

Morocco

-0.086

-0.07

Netherlands

-0.354

0.42

NewZealand

-0.336

0.53

Peru

-1.038

0.30

Philippines

-0.586

-0.14

Poland

-0.390

0.00

Portugal

0.334

-0.08

Romania

-0.051

1.17

Serbia

-0.095

1.41

Slovakia

-1.012

0.80

Slovenia

1.341

0.57

SouthAfrica

0.910

0.00

SouthKorea

-1.441

-1.94

Spain

-0.876

0.10

Switzerland

-0.210

1.13

Taiwan

-1.081

-0.96

Tanzania

1.551

-0.35

Turkey

0.118

1.34

Ukraine

-0.608

-2.00

UnitedKingdom

0.069

-0.51

UnitedStates

0.743

0.30

Zimbabwe

1.314

-0.38

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Schizotypal Fact Sheet (version 2)

Schizotypal fact sheet version 2 Table of Contents Symptoms Ideas of reference Magical thinking  Odd speech Eccentricity Social anxiety No close friends Unusual perceptual experiences Constricted affect Paranoid ideation Common traits Antagonomia Delayed sleep phase Ambivalence Dyslexic-like traits Motor control Self disorders Anomalous self experience Hyper-reflectivity Double bookkeeping Childhood schizotypal personality disorder The schizophrenia spectrum Personality traits Big Five MBTI Fisher temperament inventory Attachment styles Interests & Strengths Cognitive ability and intelligence Theory of mind Relationship with worldviews and religiosity Relationship with and differentiation from other disorders Psychopathy Borderline personality disorder Schizoid, avoidant, paranoid, and schizophrenia Bipolar disorder Histrionic and narcissistic personality disorder Obsessive-compulsive disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder  Substance use Mood disorders Diss...
Read more

Eggs In One Basket: A Model For Understanding the Maladaptive and Adaptive Dimensions of Mental Disorders, and Their Relations with Personality

Image
Eggs In One Basket: A Model For Understanding the Maladaptive and Adaptive Dimensions of Mental Disorders, and Their Relations with Personality Psychiatric disorders have been characterized as having a basis in one or more personality dimensions that correspond to symptom dimensions of the disorder, however the reason for these symptom dimensions occurring together is left unexplained, as the personality dimensions that the symptom dimensions map onto are not correlated. Furthermore, evolutionary theories of psychiatric disorders are apparently contradicted by the multidimensionality of psychiatric disorders, where one dimension is associated with positive outcomes supporting the evolutionary hypothesis, but the other dimension is associated with negative outcomes that contradict the hypothesis. The lack of correlation between personality traits that symptoms map onto has been previously explained as such disorders not indicating traditional symptoms of features that covary together, b...
Read more

Rationality as a Combination of Cognitive Empathy and Intelligence, and Low Disgust

Image
Rationality as a Combination of Cognitive Empathy and Intelligence, and Low Disgust Cognitive empathy has been seen as a trait that confers conformity and is opposed to rationality to a degree (e.g., Crespi & Badcock 2008). This assumption comes from multiple areas, but largely from the observation that more extraverted and sociable people are more conforming, which has inaccurately been conflated with cognitive empathy. Social skills have differing correlates from cognitive empathy (Cloudfindings 2024b), and do not predict better understanding of human variation. I have previously argued that cognitive empathy is associated with aspects of higher rationality, such as non-conformity and less moral absolutism (Cloudfindings 2023a)(Cloudfindings 2024a) and these hypotheses were supported by a study I conducted (Cloudfindings 2024b). Andersen (2022) put forth similar hypotheses suggesting cognitive empathy (in opposition to autistic traits) is associated with less conformist worldview...
Read more